Where He all go bad? Well, we all use a massive quantity of electricity. And demand more. But fair because we demanded more he does not mean that we have to have more. And although it has meant that we have to have more, does not mean that it has to be of such potentially dangerous source. I means, really want to risk that they burn dulcemente to death or something equally horrible, fair pues can have our electric comforts? And that it is the one who he really boils down to (excuse the pun).
Physicist Dr Michio Kaku Says that the firefighters putting the water to the cores is the one who is train to prevent a worse disaster than that of Chernobyl, and there would have to be an evacuation of full staircase, the absence of these firefighters and his work would direct to a same disaster bigger that Chernobyl. Another, like Dr Emoto, Of water-afamada of energy, is train to organize the too much that cure and prayer. The Prayer seems to be an option against the stupidity of man.
After the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986, one would have expected that we when the human race has learnt our lesson. No so much. March 11, 2011, Japan has suffered the natural disaster of the earthquake of 8.9 in Richter scale that puts of the tsunami, that has begun the man-disaster done in the Fukushima nuclear plant.
Distinctly, precisamos sources more reliable of energy, also energy so more strict political of control. But this is the madness of him. You see, slope so to achieve a system of solar energy place when it does to buy a really good television, washing machine, and some how many other electrical elements. And most of people will go out and buy the artilugios, no the life-except system of solar energy. And where there is wind, can have more wind-the energy based has produced. OK, Pues some wind-the farms are very noisy, but a solution can be found. It would say that it is easier to find this solution that to find a way to do the nuclear energy sure. Precisamos Do a realistic plan to finish the nuclear energy as soon as possible.
The risk versus the profits. Nuclear proponents maintains to promise that now nuclear is sure. Even so, have listened this before my lifetime and pues know that it is better wishful thought and worse one frankly mentida. They have said it after Chernobyl, 15 years before Fukishima.
Find out more about fukushima nuclear plant here.
No comments:
Post a Comment