Surveillance, Architecture et Société
Find out more about bin laden compound here.
Showing posts with label ARCHITECTURE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ARCHITECTURE. Show all posts
Monday, 9 May 2011
Surveillance, Architecture and Society
Technology of surveillance also offers a new way to look in the creation, slippage and transparency of borders. The Borders have gone up where cover of cameras, or coverage of end, involving a change in space, social contact, and control. While it camera is the physical marker of the border, the lines is invisible, transparent. The Surveillance also leaves by a slippage of borders. To transfer events in a localización to a localización far road it camera, the borders are no longer definite and physical, and the events are no longer content in the space happen inside. By virtue of these possibilities, also see that the borders have become transparent and indefinite, developing the zone of influence a place given has.
The Space like container involves an exploration of the consequences of the life put in a monitor, when space like the container for social activity becomes contained in the eye of the camera. Koskela Suggest that ##varied result of negative things of this process. Firstly, the camera is detached of the scene is train to contain in several ways. The first being that is drawn to resolve crimes, not to prevent them , pues working in a frame of different time that we live inside. Second, when with the panopticon, is not known if any is behind it camera or no, and if there is, his localización is entirely unknown. This directs to uneasiness and skepticism on the camera and the urban space covers. If something happens, such time the person behind the camera is too far was to do anything. Third, the camera sees the scene like object contained and has any interaction of influence in him. At the same time, forms of surveillance are both transparent and opaque. Everything under surveillance is train to become more visible while the sources are train to become more opaque, producing an effect of uncertainty in the public. Lastly, The space like container reveals a objectified reality, in which the image displaces reality. It is not different a space of stage. The People happen on and out of the frame of view, or stage. The world lived is transformed to #a 2 dimensional projection of the world-wide void of any human contact, increasing the sense of people and of the objects in a container. This is not different Foucault observations of the panopticon cells, saying, "are as so cages, so small theaters, in which each actor is only, perfectly individualized and constantly visible." This is a connection a lot of entity because Foucault also asserts that the visibility is used society of preserve that controls systems of power and knowledge. This connection suggests that helps of use of the CCTV to maintain structures of social hierarchy place, with the power that remains to hands of the invisible.
Power-the space is based in the studies of as surveillance of video affects interactions of power. What is easily noticed is that the surveillance is not a power-neutral condition. "Looking connotates power, and when being looked in powerlessness." The Surveillance turns the city to a panopticon, linking power, knowledge and spatial. This is one extremely fascinating idea, questioning if the urban space under surveillance is in fact a prison of the psyche, conforming behavior to the social norms established by that power. The Cameras are used to try to prevent deviant behavior to control people to control the space. But the lines are not to clear so to those who has the power. A lot of cameras are private possessed, in the doing impossible to know who is in the another final of the camera. Subject of gender also are considered, because the women are more often under surveillance, and the men are more often behind the camera. Compounding The subject of gender, the feminist theory dictates that the identity is big part formed #by, and by, relations of power. This involves that the anonymous surveillance can have a negative affect identity and he raises questions on the camera that is used like tool by harassment.
A lot of people see a corollary between the panopticon and surveillance of modern video and television of circuit closed (CCTV). Fear increased, especially run 9/11, has directed in a fast increase in the number and density of surveillance to modern cities. The first use of CCTV was 1942 to remark the launching of V-2 rockets. Olean, New York was the first city to implement CCTV in his main street to try to struggle crime. The next development was the use of CCTV in banks to try to prevent theft by clients, outsiders, and personal. With increasing fear of terrorism and crime in the 1990s and 2000s, centres of city became zones of constant surveillance. While the aim is to deter crime, CCTV footage is more useful to resolve crimes and gathering evidence. CCTV footage Has been used to identify London Underground bomber, and footage is used regularly in track the movements to lose boys. Subject of privacy are debated also, with a lot of critics have worried that the technology encroaches privacy and civil liberties. Even so, proponents argues that cameras surveil public space, where one can not never expect have a lot of privacy anyways. The increase urban surveillance has directed in a wide variety of effects and observations of the consequences of the camera. Study changing it nature of urban space, Koskela remarks 3 types of space: space like container, power-space, and emotional space. The Observations the furthest have been done on the division of space, exclusion and division, and a blur between public and private.
The emotional Space tries to comprise the emotional impact to be #under surveillance. While the obvious aim is to do the half ambientes urban surer, and instill a sense of security, the attitudes are often more ambivalente. Some feel guilty, uneasy and uncertain when to who is train to look, and can create feelings of vulnerability. For a woman only in a season of subway, the camera can do being sure also like unsafe. Who is train to look? Be under the control of the camera means no when being no control of the situation.
When with transparency, the surveillance there is complex series of interactions with spatial and experience. To contain and flattening space, objectifying people, influencing relations of power, and affecting the emotions and perceptions of the people that are looked, surveillance, coupled with architecture, has the election to be interesting or seen with ambivalence. My lies of interest in both the spatial quality of surveillance, and the social ramifications of him. How Can surveillance be exploded? Diller+Scofidio HAS #a lot projects to examine transparency and of the cameras that give good idea in the subjects and of the applications in architecture. Studies of cases of these projects provide a lovely supplement to research. 'Course of jump', 'Facsimile' and the installation proposed 'Space of Sky' all transparency of use and cameras to defy expectations and change the apparent reality. The exhibition of people and space is manipulated with the camera. While no so invasive when CCTV, the cameras in the project still objectify people, the quita of social contact with the viewers, and put them exhibition, delivering them to scrutiny of the people in the privileged position to look.
The Surveillance has a long history architecture and society. During history and modernity, the surveillance has been used like method of control, a symbol of power. It has been it lately used to ensure, or tentativa to manifest, security in half ambientes urban. This has increased the complexity of the subject and developed the extent. Power, control, gender, fear and mistrust is entwined surveillance. How Is the surveillance used architecture and of the half ambientes urban? What is his consequences and future implications?
Modern and that evolves the technology has given increase to same of new forms of surveillance and the panopticon. Poster of Mark sees our wired world like "Superpanopticon, a system of surveillance without muros, windows, turns, or policemen." People with telephones of camera respond to events to photograph and texting lives information across coverages of communication. Involved also is that the public is now under scrutiny by the public. No longer is cameras of CCTV the only form of surveillance and control, now the general population will use similar methods to control social behavior and events of register to the city. Also called the Participatory Panopticon by James Esquerdo, this develop technology and surveillance is a new form whole of architecture of surveillance and digital space.
Transparency, the surveillance and the architecture have come firstly I together with the advent of Jeremy Bentham Panopticon in the late 18th Century. The panopticon has been conceived like prison in which a minimum number of policemen could look the population of whole prison. The Cells done on top of the perimeter of the prison of round, creating a strong backlight in the prisoners. The centre of the prison of round was the tower of policeman, concealing the policemen inside. Of this configuration, was easy for the policemen to see exactly the one who the prisoners were until nothing time. Even so, there was more in the prison that the cells. Because the policemen could not be seen, the prisoners have had to suppose always were looked. Like this, when Hille Koskela said in "The gaze without eyes: video-surveillance and changing it nature of urban space", "while the panopticon ostensibly maintains the body entrapped, is aimed in fact in the psyche: in this mechanism 'the soul is the prison of the body.'" Is is train to interest because Koskela argues that the surveillance no only controls a body that moves by space, but also affects the spirit of the body. The act to be constantly seen by an invisible and unknown the power done #a proof to conform to the social norms have expected. The spirit and the soul are forced to do the body behave in an acceptable way. While the body is imprisoned, is the soul that suffers. Michel Foucault add, "the visibility is a cheat. It is by this visibility that the modern society exerts his controlling system of power and knowledge." How in the panopticon, the visibility sees the body, but inflicts changes in the spirit. Visibility coerces people to conforming to social norms that are established by that power.
Find out more about bin laden compound here.
The Space like container involves an exploration of the consequences of the life put in a monitor, when space like the container for social activity becomes contained in the eye of the camera. Koskela Suggest that ##varied result of negative things of this process. Firstly, the camera is detached of the scene is train to contain in several ways. The first being that is drawn to resolve crimes, not to prevent them , pues working in a frame of different time that we live inside. Second, when with the panopticon, is not known if any is behind it camera or no, and if there is, his localización is entirely unknown. This directs to uneasiness and skepticism on the camera and the urban space covers. If something happens, such time the person behind the camera is too far was to do anything. Third, the camera sees the scene like object contained and has any interaction of influence in him. At the same time, forms of surveillance are both transparent and opaque. Everything under surveillance is train to become more visible while the sources are train to become more opaque, producing an effect of uncertainty in the public. Lastly, The space like container reveals a objectified reality, in which the image displaces reality. It is not different a space of stage. The People happen on and out of the frame of view, or stage. The world lived is transformed to #a 2 dimensional projection of the world-wide void of any human contact, increasing the sense of people and of the objects in a container. This is not different Foucault observations of the panopticon cells, saying, "are as so cages, so small theaters, in which each actor is only, perfectly individualized and constantly visible." This is a connection a lot of entity because Foucault also asserts that the visibility is used society of preserve that controls systems of power and knowledge. This connection suggests that helps of use of the CCTV to maintain structures of social hierarchy place, with the power that remains to hands of the invisible.
Power-the space is based in the studies of as surveillance of video affects interactions of power. What is easily noticed is that the surveillance is not a power-neutral condition. "Looking connotates power, and when being looked in powerlessness." The Surveillance turns the city to a panopticon, linking power, knowledge and spatial. This is one extremely fascinating idea, questioning if the urban space under surveillance is in fact a prison of the psyche, conforming behavior to the social norms established by that power. The Cameras are used to try to prevent deviant behavior to control people to control the space. But the lines are not to clear so to those who has the power. A lot of cameras are private possessed, in the doing impossible to know who is in the another final of the camera. Subject of gender also are considered, because the women are more often under surveillance, and the men are more often behind the camera. Compounding The subject of gender, the feminist theory dictates that the identity is big part formed #by, and by, relations of power. This involves that the anonymous surveillance can have a negative affect identity and he raises questions on the camera that is used like tool by harassment.
A lot of people see a corollary between the panopticon and surveillance of modern video and television of circuit closed (CCTV). Fear increased, especially run 9/11, has directed in a fast increase in the number and density of surveillance to modern cities. The first use of CCTV was 1942 to remark the launching of V-2 rockets. Olean, New York was the first city to implement CCTV in his main street to try to struggle crime. The next development was the use of CCTV in banks to try to prevent theft by clients, outsiders, and personal. With increasing fear of terrorism and crime in the 1990s and 2000s, centres of city became zones of constant surveillance. While the aim is to deter crime, CCTV footage is more useful to resolve crimes and gathering evidence. CCTV footage Has been used to identify London Underground bomber, and footage is used regularly in track the movements to lose boys. Subject of privacy are debated also, with a lot of critics have worried that the technology encroaches privacy and civil liberties. Even so, proponents argues that cameras surveil public space, where one can not never expect have a lot of privacy anyways. The increase urban surveillance has directed in a wide variety of effects and observations of the consequences of the camera. Study changing it nature of urban space, Koskela remarks 3 types of space: space like container, power-space, and emotional space. The Observations the furthest have been done on the division of space, exclusion and division, and a blur between public and private.
The emotional Space tries to comprise the emotional impact to be #under surveillance. While the obvious aim is to do the half ambientes urban surer, and instill a sense of security, the attitudes are often more ambivalente. Some feel guilty, uneasy and uncertain when to who is train to look, and can create feelings of vulnerability. For a woman only in a season of subway, the camera can do being sure also like unsafe. Who is train to look? Be under the control of the camera means no when being no control of the situation.
When with transparency, the surveillance there is complex series of interactions with spatial and experience. To contain and flattening space, objectifying people, influencing relations of power, and affecting the emotions and perceptions of the people that are looked, surveillance, coupled with architecture, has the election to be interesting or seen with ambivalence. My lies of interest in both the spatial quality of surveillance, and the social ramifications of him. How Can surveillance be exploded? Diller+Scofidio HAS #a lot projects to examine transparency and of the cameras that give good idea in the subjects and of the applications in architecture. Studies of cases of these projects provide a lovely supplement to research. 'Course of jump', 'Facsimile' and the installation proposed 'Space of Sky' all transparency of use and cameras to defy expectations and change the apparent reality. The exhibition of people and space is manipulated with the camera. While no so invasive when CCTV, the cameras in the project still objectify people, the quita of social contact with the viewers, and put them exhibition, delivering them to scrutiny of the people in the privileged position to look.
The Surveillance has a long history architecture and society. During history and modernity, the surveillance has been used like method of control, a symbol of power. It has been it lately used to ensure, or tentativa to manifest, security in half ambientes urban. This has increased the complexity of the subject and developed the extent. Power, control, gender, fear and mistrust is entwined surveillance. How Is the surveillance used architecture and of the half ambientes urban? What is his consequences and future implications?
Modern and that evolves the technology has given increase to same of new forms of surveillance and the panopticon. Poster of Mark sees our wired world like "Superpanopticon, a system of surveillance without muros, windows, turns, or policemen." People with telephones of camera respond to events to photograph and texting lives information across coverages of communication. Involved also is that the public is now under scrutiny by the public. No longer is cameras of CCTV the only form of surveillance and control, now the general population will use similar methods to control social behavior and events of register to the city. Also called the Participatory Panopticon by James Esquerdo, this develop technology and surveillance is a new form whole of architecture of surveillance and digital space.
Transparency, the surveillance and the architecture have come firstly I together with the advent of Jeremy Bentham Panopticon in the late 18th Century. The panopticon has been conceived like prison in which a minimum number of policemen could look the population of whole prison. The Cells done on top of the perimeter of the prison of round, creating a strong backlight in the prisoners. The centre of the prison of round was the tower of policeman, concealing the policemen inside. Of this configuration, was easy for the policemen to see exactly the one who the prisoners were until nothing time. Even so, there was more in the prison that the cells. Because the policemen could not be seen, the prisoners have had to suppose always were looked. Like this, when Hille Koskela said in "The gaze without eyes: video-surveillance and changing it nature of urban space", "while the panopticon ostensibly maintains the body entrapped, is aimed in fact in the psyche: in this mechanism 'the soul is the prison of the body.'" Is is train to interest because Koskela argues that the surveillance no only controls a body that moves by space, but also affects the spirit of the body. The act to be constantly seen by an invisible and unknown the power done #a proof to conform to the social norms have expected. The spirit and the soul are forced to do the body behave in an acceptable way. While the body is imprisoned, is the soul that suffers. Michel Foucault add, "the visibility is a cheat. It is by this visibility that the modern society exerts his controlling system of power and knowledge." How in the panopticon, the visibility sees the body, but inflicts changes in the spirit. Visibility coerces people to conforming to social norms that are established by that power.
Find out more about bin laden compound here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)