Dredging On top of the Past - Vincent Bugliosi and GW Bush Disappoint

But, of course, everything of this disappointment by the administration of Bush is history now; and would have to move on to problems and of the retos current times of dredging on top of the past. GW Bush has gone. He forgets on him! Correct?
Another would signal out that there is much more pressing problems to treat; this disposal after Bush and Cheney serious disruptive, so much politically and socially; and even could frustrate the efforts of the new administration to treat the gargantuan the crises have left on by Bush-Cheney.
Bugliosi Has issued a reto to our morals conciencia, to our commitment at the beginning in our laws (person is above the law), and to our respect because they have died, who sacrificed, -- and consequence of the invasion of Bush of Irak. Which answer have by no responding? Only can think of the utilitarian answered: more damage that well would result in the nation to go after Bush, Cheney and Rice.
"Even most of courageous between #prpers only seldom has the value for the cual that really knows."
F. Nietzsche, "The Twilight of the Idols"
#Fail Negative: The administrations of Bush of the GW entirely that it ignores all the signals of a impending attacks in the USA for the Qaeda between Jan 20, 2001 and September 10, 2001
No! The subject of the national integrity is not old. The subjects of justice and examination of crime of war is not old. The need to recognize and compensate the victims of the misguided political of war is not old. The need to examine and re-examine the events that have directed in our national disaster is not old.
Logicians, The scientific and the philosophers often inform to the logical fallacies of inference of false negative (failing to recognize evidence that is available, hence failing to draw the correct conclusion) and inference of false positive (invalidly drawing a conclusion of evidence imagined, this that simply does not exist ). If nothing more, the fortunately departed administration of Bush of the GW we has given big examples of each how of these fallacies, the premier admissible like misstep or mistake reasoning; the second more a case of deceptive tactic of persuasion, that a mere misstep reasoning.
Bugliosi Has remembered me of all this is his 2008 publication: The Prosecution of GW Bush for Murder .
[Researched and informed by the 9/11 Bi-Adherent Commission, an investigation opposed by GW Bush and hindered in each turn by the lack of the administration of cooperation.]
b) Irak Possessed WMDs and posed a military threat serious in United States.
[The false positive" the fallacy was part of a biencoordinado, highly deceptive campaign to persuade Congress and the People norteamericanas that an invasion of Irak has been required.]

Bugliosi Offered of the arguments developed well by each how of his conclusions and provides a wealth of evidence in support of these conclusions, remembering us of all this past (9/11 attacks, the war in terrorism, the 9/11 Commission to research the attacks, and the adventure of Bush in Irak) during the eight years that Bush was power. The book inserts photographs to show the death, suffering, and the destruction that results of our invasion of Irak --- juxtaposed with photos of our fearless leader, laughing and clowning around, entirely unmindful of the consequences of his immoral politics. When has said once, answer in the question of a reporter, he and Laura had spent one most of enjoyable year (the same year of untold dead and destruction in Irak, and the unjust charge and deprivation stop ours to combat personal and his families).
It does the Bugliosi the book suffers because it is simply dredging on top of old subjects, which more would have to remain only?
A) there was a connection between Saddam Husein Iraqi govern and the to the Qaeda terrorist that have attacked in 9/11 and #his leader, Osama bucket Laden; and almost
wish had chosen an alternative title for the book, when the his editor has chosen finds so also sensationalist, probably discouraging serious readers. His book merit a width readership.
Vincent Bugliosi does not agree . It has remembered me shameful acts (calls them fallacies if it likes you) by the administration of Bush of the GW, and has remembered me also on the shameful capitulación by Congress, the average news, and general citizens. It has remembered me of the extension to the as reportamos "sheep-like" in our readiness to be misled by the propaganda and the lies generated by Bush, Cheney, Rices and the rest of this gang.
What does in the community psyche of the roughly 50% of voters that have chosen that it instrument - Bush & Cheney - to direct the nation in 2000 and 2004? What says on our process of election if these people chosen to the White House was later indicted and convict (hopefully) of murder? When the old clich? hedes The, Which he the fabric of the nation?
On the other hand, the integrity of the nation - moral and legal integrity -- is subject. The principle that any person is above the law is subject. The victims of Bush immoral war, disastrous cry of politics out of since justice and honesty in our part.
Very Little are clean in this subject. An overwhelming majority of people, the Congress, the average news, and our institutions estimated (religions, educative, legal, philosophical) has been persuaded by the official propaganda and has been together with Bush-Cheney-Rice-Rumsfeld. We become war mongers! Bush-Cheney Treaty in our name, the citizens of the the USA. Now we (collective agents) is obligated to put things well. GW Bush, Cheney, C. The Rice has to be carried in justice. They lied, deceived, and abused his power ---- and directed to persuade Congress, the average news, and the people norteamericanas to sustain his military invasion of a country that was any threat in the the USA have profité of the 9/11 attacks, fear of attacks more terrorist, and peoples' fear to be branded soft terrorism.
Positive failure: All the 'evidence' false touted by the administration of Bush of the GW to affirm that Very little
religious or political leaders have gone out opposition to the enthusiastic of war. Where was our sociologists and philosophers? Very Few voiced opposition, and this that has been listened was mostly muted and ignored. Our average news, ###both impression and electronic, who are suppositions to be "watchdogs" against abuses of power by our official, has failed miserably. Time evaluadora and critical analysis of politics, became acclaiming it " section" for Bush-Cheney.
A lot you, of course, will be put of by the title (One can no possibly imagine that our previous PODUS could be a murderer?) And will imagine that Bugliosi is a bit nutty, an extreme adherent that has published a sensationalist reserves no the value that he considers. If this is your view, you would have died badly. By all the accounts Bugliosi is neither nutty neither an extreme adherent. It is an excellent lawyer, once one of better America prosecutors, possessing a logical spirit, rational and the value to say the one who another would have to have been saying. But more importantly, Bugliosi is a citizen that still believes in the ideals and fiancé of America, and that it is morally outraged by which GW Bush and the company have pulled was and apparently will achieve out with.
Our institutions estimated --- religious, legal, philosophical, educative --- failed when all this happened.

Find out more about osama bin laden dead here.