Rove The Statements describe his proper point of view on as the past things and so "truthful" when it tries to be, the stays in fact when it is, there was any WMD in Irak. It could no except read the statement again, the administration, even without the WMD hoax, would have looked for other ways to carry on regime change. So In other words, the administration would have found another excuse to interfere in another country. If there is any reason, will do ud. Pues Why go in Irak then? The WMD was a lie, the connection of Saddam with Bucket Laden was a lie, oh attentive has a reason, the "horrendous right humans violación" this the east!
Rove There is precisado also to mention that we initiate the war to extend Democracy in Irak. Still like this probably would forget to declare that this Democracy has put hundreds of Iraqis behind the fair bars before procedural of elections. It would have forgotten also that this Democracy does not object the same "horrendous right humans violaciones" that have been committed by Saddam regime, if that they treat them is our allies, the new rulers of Irak.
It has written also "" Irak the War has arrived without WMD? I the doubt" "the Congress was very unlikely to have sustained the use-of-resolution by force without the threat of WMD. The administration of Bush would have looked for probably #other ways to constrain Saddam, ameno on regime change, and treat Irak horrendous human rights violaciones."
Pues Sent our young men brave and women to die together with miles of mercenaries to arrest the human rights violaciones. We initiate the horrendous acts Abu Gharib prison. We abolish The Iraqi regime and his countless registers of human rights violaciones by violaciones of our proper. After all, when Iraqis sees worse forget on the damage, anybody? The Irony is that all the world has known that Saddam regime has not sustained human rights (to say the least) still like this any in the administration has had to show the world like the USA maintains a clean register in this half.
Karl Rove, often described like President Bush brain (Why any precise an external brain if they have had one of his proper), has written in his book 'Value and Consequence' than defence the War of the President in Irak " mentida of Bush we in war? Absolutely not"
The aim we achieve is train to change the regime in Irak. We found WMD? We abolish Or the help abole human rights violaciones in Irak? He am even looking to establish a true Democracy in Irak? When The answer to all of the #on is No, then by default the answer in the question " mentida of Bush we in war?" It is a definite Himself.
Find out more about osama bin laden here.