There are some people that believe that the acts of terrorism are necessary damages" and is precisado to create a world a plus democratic. I disagree. Political reasons, even so noble, does not constitute the acts of terrorism against civil. Why owe of a woman that takes his girls in colegial or in the market be shot down in the streets like a dog by some misguided fool that thinks his actions topple a dictator of power? The vast majority of victims of terrorism is women and of the girls. The Women and the girls mostly do not begin wars or commit actas of terrorism. In spite of the fact than incidents #be there women and the girls that commit actas of terrorism like becoming bombers of suicide, that is not the norm.The Men are charge of the economic and political systems to the world. If the be a legitimate government or a outlaw, rebellious one, the men are the players of entity in the game and is those that plan out of actas terrorist. If a political group has a problem with another group, would have to aim the group specifically time to bomb a busy marketplace where the women and the girls would be the big majority. This is a sexist and pedophilic society lived inside. Neither the group has a lot amparo or respect and can be looked in so easily replaceable casualties of war.
The purpose of this proof is to show that the acts of terrorism are morally badly because the women and the girls are the usual victims of terrorism, the terrorism does not serve any purpose excepts to lives of ruin, and that because murdered of uses of the terrorism and the murder is bad. The War and the subsequent terrorism are two of most of inhumane and useless inventions that the human society has created and can have any justification by premeditated violence against innocent for any purpose.
Previously, Osama bucket Laden had issued two fatwas (a legal Islamic pronouncement), one 1996 and a 1998 asking the murder of all the civil and military personnel of United States and allied countries by Muslims until they recall political support by Israel and recall military strengths of Islamic countries. It has done this plans work? No. The United States for all attempts and the proper purposes Irak, is still next allies with Saudi Arabia and Israel of still support to the plus full. Any terrorist attacks directed by Bucket Laden and his cohorts has showed he and his to be both morally bankrupt and stupid.
Finally, any terrorist attack is morally bad. To condone murdered, rape and plunder of innocent because of profit or political reasons is morally reprehensible. The United States finally will have to pay the price for an act of the terrorism committed in his proper shores: the decimation of the nation norteamericana Native that has existed peacefully for centuries before the advent of colonists the one who violence and terrorism used to destroy and decimate innocent for financial profit. Anything obtained because of the terrorism is covered with the blood of his victims.
Secondly, The acts of terrorism serve any purpose excepts to kill and maim million and do the lives of the miserable individuals. Violence begets more violence and as it can actas like kidnapping and killing a first minister, attacking a village and raping all the women and girls or putting of a suicide bombs to kill miles be morally correct? Although bombing it of the Centre of World-wide Trade crippled the foundations of the norteamericanos economic and political systems for a short time and carried marries the possibility in addition to invasions to million, finally was for nothing.
There is on 100 definitions of hundred of the terrorism "of word" but my definition is: the terrorism is the use organized of violence to destroy and decimate innocent for any purpose, political or nonsensical. In the it Congo, women, the girls and the creatures are raped with impunity. On thirty Chicago the school students publics have been murdered this year only. Under this definition, both of these acts are considered terrorism.
Lastly, The acts of terrorism are morally badly because most of actas of end of terrorism on top of murdering the people and the murder of any kind is bad. The Murder does not resolve of the problems but create more problems. Murder violates the sanctity of life and course of the skill of his victims to live his lives when they have loved. To murder any takes a sure kind of arrogance. The one who finally has the correct to have life or trial of dead to human being? Person. I am a mother of three to the one who love him his boys fiercely. If one of them has been killed, would love justice for my boy. It would love the person that perpetrated the crime to be closed up for all eternity in a small cell with little human contact. Why? A murderer would have to suffer mental and emotional agonies and the death is too easy. Killing the perpetrator of the crime would not carry my boy protects anymore that the shooting of Saddam Husein has carried behind the lives of hundreds of Curdos has ordered slaughtered. The ends do not justify the half when it comes to murder.
Find out more about bin laden killed here.
No comments:
Post a Comment