Terrorism - A Review

Islam Condemns all the forms of Terrorism. All the forms of actas that kill innocent human beings, if it is 9/11, 7/7/93 (Bombay serial blast), 11/7/03 or anybody another. It is prohibited, can not justify killing of any innocent human being.
Killed 20 million human beings comprising 14.5 million was starved to death.
Today, if you try to travel it is a hassle. If your name is Mohammad or Aziz and are a normal citizen, are given special treatment in negative sense. Now before Ida deep in this subject is better to define the one who is meant in fact by the Terrorism "of word".
Whereas the word "Islam" he means "Pau", whose fundamentals teachs his followers to maintain and promote peace during the world. Anyone, the Muslim being or no-Muslim, the one who kills an innocent Muslim or one no-Muslim, callada the whole humanity. Even so, Islam goes one no further to say that if ones save innocent lives, the whole of humanity is saved.
ii. 1000 Of innocent people that have been killed in Irak.
It had incinerated 6 million Jews And indirectly himself explain all the people killed in II of World-wide War, 60 million present. It was a Muslim!? No, was a Christian.
iii. We have terrorist Jewish
The number 1 who has killed the maximum number of human beings is...
Also have to condemn..
I am not justifying this act, Islam does not allow you that it takes the law manually and kill other innocent human beings, and Islam does not justify to use badly means to achieve the correct aims. The People would not have to take the law in his hands. But in spite of this fact that reacts like this is natural by any normal human being unless you have so faith Almighty God, even also will do equal, if we do not know our Quran, if we have not known of the Quran the bad east. So Fair because any causes mine injustice, this does not justify me to kill a third innocent human being.
"If any slew a person - unless the being for murder or to extend mischief in the earth - would be so if he slew the whole people: and if any one has saved a life, would be so if it has saved the life of the whole people." - The Quran, Surah To the Mine'idah Ch. 5 V. 32

By this each Muslim would have to be a fundamentalist and.I. It would have to follow the fundamentals of the Religion of Pau Islam. It would have to be a terrorist only to the antisociales elements to promote peaces and justice in the society.
Today the world is an increasingly complex world and in this complex world, the retos new are train to arise, has arisen and will arise. The lesson learn in the life is not to remain still, thinks further and out of the box and try know the retos new with vigour. And between this Terrorism "of retos" is one of most of subject spoken.
vii. We have Sikh terrorist
And when we a survey, (although we know that the religions do not encourage killing innocent human beings) and try and discover that the people that have killed the maximum human beings than religion they profess...
For example after a terrorist attack in India 2 people have been taken by the police, they sound has said to be the Muslim and the authority have said these people killed so people in the Hindus temple in revenge. Even so these people, those who the attack have a logic. It says, "Miles of our familiar members have been killed in front of our eyes, have been looted, know the person that is responsible for all this, is our neighbor, he have known regularly, but when we see him remembers us of the touch, when we go to the law the law no we sustains , pues took the law manually.".
I know generally the Terrorist "of word" has used only negative sense (and.I. For a person that causes terror between the common people). For example Oxford the dictionary defines the terrorism of word when, "the use of violent actions to achieve political aims or to force a government to treat". So much in this context any Muslim ten never terrorize an innocent human being sun, is prohibited Islam.
I. We have terrorist Christians
All the kinds of the terrorism in which innocent human being is killed is to be condemn. Yes done by Muslims or No Muslim.
The Basic and mere definition of terrorism is: the Terrorism is an activity that causes terror, and the person that causes this activity is terrorist call. The moment a robber sees one civilize is terrified. Pues Some police is a terrorist by the robber. In this context each Muslim would have to be a terrorist. When A criminal sees the Muslim would have to be terrified, Whenever any rapists sees the Muslim would have to be terrified, Whenever any robber sees the Muslim would have to be terrified, Whenever any antisocial the element sees the Muslim would have to be terrified. This is the one who the Quran finger Surah To the-Anfall Ch. 8 V 60 "terror of Cause in the heart of anti-social elements". These people that are train to kill surroundings to people and that are against humanity Quran said terror of cause in his hearts.
iv. We have Hindu the terrorist
have Killed 14 to 20 million human beings. It was one No Muslim.
1. Hitler.
Pues Would have to quitar the injustice of this earth to delete Terrorism otherwise each act to delete it would cause of increase in Terrorism.
3. Mao Tse Tsung Of China
ii. We have terrorist Introduction
Catholic
2. José Stalin (Uncle Joe)
If we want to abolish terrorism, have to realize the one who is the cause of terrorism. The experts say the cause of root of terrorism is injustice. When the injustice is done in a group of particular people tend to retaliate, and that it is the only cause of terrorism.
We know that any religion encourages violence or of the terrorist acts. Also know that in each religion there is black sheep and the average maintains to put these people he advances. This is a half conspiracy especially against Islam and the purpose is to push people out of Islam. International average repeatedly is publishing, "All the Muslims are not the terrorist but all the terrorist are Injustice"
of Definition
of the Muslims a cause of root of terrorism.
When have mentioned before that most of the religions do not preach that you would have to kill innocent human beings. But when we analysed, have terrorist that clamor to profess sure religions and when they analyse are of all the type of religion...
The Terrorism does not know any border and these days have gone when you could it say past country X or continent I.
Here are not trying to say that the followers of these religions practised the religion. They have not been, otherwise would not have killed an innocent human being alone. But still like this found in the International average that the Muslims are train to be aimed. The Question is Why? And ente all know the answer of him.
iii. 1000 Of people that have been killed in Gujarat.
I. 1000 Of Afghani this is train to be killed in Afghanistan.
It is by so of entity that before a person is enjuiciada, is given a listened fair. Both cost of the argument would have to be listened, the situation would have to be analysed, and the reason and the intention of the person would have to be had in account, and then the person can be enjuiciada accordingly. For example to judge himself Osama Bucket Laden is a terrorist or no? We can not give the answer in this question based in the reports of news of BBC and CNN. If it loves the answer based in the news of CNN or BBC do not have any option but to say that it is a terrorist. But the Quran finger Surah Hujrat Ch.49 V.6,"Whenever Achieved any information, controls up before you happen it on in the second person." So much, that there is lack of reliable information can not answer this type of answers so easily.
Historic Records tried that a big number of actas terrorist in the 20th and 21st the century has been committed by no-Muslim. And when we analysed surely can say without any doubt that the terrorism is not a Muslim monopoly. No only is Terrorism no a Muslim monopoly, is not even a specialty of the Muslims. It is encouraged not even Islam. It is prohibited...
Two Different Labels, Same Activity!
V. We have terrorist Muslim
know two different labels are given for the same person for the same individual, for the same activity. 60 years behind when India was governed by the British executive there was very Indian that struggled for the freedom of his country. These Indians that struggled for the freedom of the country by the British executive have been called how of the terrorist. But the common Indians have called them Fighters of Freedom or Patriots. Same people, Same Activity, Two Different Labels. If you agree with the view of British government that have had a correct to govern on India that you have to call these people and of the terrorist. But if you agree with the view of common Indians that the British era has come in India for subject have no correct to govern on India, that you have to them call Fighter of Freedom or Patriots.
iv. 1000 Of people that have been killed in Palestinian.
V. 1000 Of the people killed in Lebanon.
I have seen. We have the Buddhist terrorists
Is Terrorism a Muslim Monopoly?
If we looked recent history in brief will see this terrorism has arisen in North America, Latin America in parts of Asia, in the Middle Is, South Asia, Europe and Africa.

Find out more about bin laden killed here.