That Exactly is Money?

Warren Buffett, at present the man the plus rich in the world, has said that his philosophy regarding his girls is that it wants to them give quite a lot of money so that they can do anything, but no so much that they can do nothing. This sounds reasonable mine. Such time would have to be a law. Such time have to cap the quantity of wealth that can be inherited or gifted in a sure level, said one million dollars.
In the another final of the spectrum, there seems to be a problem also. A lot of people become trapped debt because of exorbitantes indicios of interest. They could have taken a $50,000 debt of a company of map of the credit, and although they continue to create value (and hence money), are unable to never achieve the debt to a manageable level. 20% indicio Of interest is absurd when the value of time of money is probably more next to 5%. Indicios Of interest on 10% probably would have to be illegal. If a person is too much of a risk crediticio to give a loan unless that indicio, then probably would have to be denied the loan by his very proper. The Humans are not of course well calculate the ramifications of any kind of indicio of interest that is compounded, if it is positive or negative. It is not fair to take advantage of them likes this. If a man is trapped debt, then essentially becomes a slave in society. Slavery, When mostly can agree, is not that we are train to look for.
Confucio Said: "If a state is governed by the principles of reason, poverty and misery is subjects of shame; if a state is not governed by the principles of reason, rich and the honours are subjects of shame." Henry David Thoreau, Civilian DisobedienceI wish to speak here of my understanding that of the that money and rich in fact bad, or would have to mean in a fair society capitalist.
The Money has all to do with value. There are things in our society that is lovely, and the money can be used to purchase these things. If a man is debt, whereas it mean has taken more value of the society that has given. If a man is rich, has given then more money in society has taken then. The Money is reverse debt. The Society is his debt, and can choose as he wishes for society to pay him protects to depend in how would like him to spend his money.
He so there is roughly flaws in our system. But in his pure form, is brilliant. Of course, I does not think it is has explained very often in this way, and most of men #try imagine out of how can achieve money for nothing. They love society by his have to something without giving in society firstly. The games of lottery in this wish. Pues Have people like Madoff, have scams, have burglars, and have players of lottery.
Time of these diagrams, if we want to be rich precisamos imagine out of how to provide massive value in society. If we that, then our wealth would have to be an honour, because it is a token of the profit have bestowed to society.
So Theory, if a man wants to become rich, would have to arrest his fijación in money and begin think on how to add massive value in the lives other people. If it does this, then it will be that it wins with money. The Society will be his debt. The índole of capitalism is that it can take a bad shot in men (greed) and turn it to something well.
There are a lot of ways to provide value in society. Most of common way that the men provide the value is by his time. They achieve a work and sell his time for money. They are compensated then for the cual, and rightfully so much. But that it is a commodity that has a value limited in society, and pues are given a quantity limited of money. To become truly rich, some needs of man to provide massive value. Henry Ford, Works of Steve, Doors of Bill: these are men that entirely changed the way lived. They have done our better lives, and society justly has rewarded them.
So that my take. The People and of the Works of Steve are #extremely rich and deservedly so much. People that are #a 4th generation inheritor of wealth, probably no so much. People that are in the debt certainly would have to be required to pay his debt behind, but in a indicio of reasonable interest. Literally #duty in society. But some people are undeservedly trapped inside debt of big interest. Pues I entirely agrees with Thoreau, which means that our society is train to do a quite good work, but has zones where he precise improvement.

So that the theory. But which next am inside practical? A thing have the reservations roughly is nepotism. As my conception of money, a lot of people begin his lives with a big debt already owed to them by society. It is this correct? On the other hand, if the father or the mother accumulated quite a lot of wealth, certainly would have to be left to bestow advantages in his girls. They have won the money, and he ought to be his correct to do with him when they please.

Find out more about bin laden compound here.